Eine Dunkle Begierde

Eine Dunkle Begierde Keiras Konstanz-Besuch Nummer 2
Psychoanalitiker Dr. Carl Gustav Jung hat eine Affäre mit seiner jungen Patientin Sabina Spielrein. Als Jung seinen Mentor Freud einweiht, ist dieser entsetzt: er fürchtet um den ohnehin schon zweifelhaften Ruf der Psychoanalyse. Eine dunkle Begierde (Originaltitel: A Dangerous Method) ist ein historisches Filmdrama des kanadischen Regisseurs David Cronenberg aus dem Jahr ladintrada.eu - Kaufen Sie Eine dunkle Begierde günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und Details zu einer. Eine Dunkle Begierde. ()1 Std. 39 MinX-Ray Carl Gustav Jung, Leiter einer psychiatrischen Klinik, wendet Freuds Psychoanalyse bei seiner. Eine dunkle Begierde. Vielleicht ist diese Aufgabe nicht zu bewältigen: Ein marginales historisches Ereignis beschreiben, mit dem sich die. Regisseur David Cronenberg hat die (therapeutische) Beziehung zwischen Sabina Spielrein und Carl Gustav Jung verfilmt. Der Spielfilm bedient viele. Eine dunkle Begierde. Filmplakat Eine dunkle Begierde. Keira Knightley, Michael Fassbender in A Dangerous Method.

Thank you! Eine dunkle Begierde 9 10 10 9. Share this article :. Label: spanking. I Love You Phillip Morris Die Thronfolgerin Nixon - Der Untergang eines Präsidenten Die Herzogin Jenseits von Afrika Alpha Dog - Tödliche Freundschaften Sigmund Freud's talking cure with some of his patients.
Spielrain's psychological problems are deeply rooted in her childhood and violent father. She is highly intelligent however and hopes to be a doctor, eventually becoming a psychiatrist in her own right.
The married Jung and Spielrein eventually become lovers. Jung and Freud develop an almost father-son relationship with Freud seeing the young Jung as his likely successor as the standard-bearer of his beliefs.
A deep rift develops between them when Jung diverges from Freud's belief that while psychoanalysis can reveal the cause of psychological problems it cannot cure the patient.
Written by garykmcd. As a long admirer of David Cronenberg, I eagerly await each of his new films as if I am a young child on Christmas Eve.
When announced that his new film, A Dangerous Method, had him working with Michael Fassbender and for a third time Viggo Mortensen, two of my favorite actors, as well as Keira Knightley and Vincent Cassel, I thought I must have been dreaming.
Adding on that the film was going to be an exploration into the relationship between Carl Jung portrayed by Fassbender and Sigmund Freud Mortensen , the gods of psychoanalysis, and this had the makings for Cronenberg's masterpiece.
So one can only begin to imagine my dismay when, after a promising first act, A Dangerous Method turned out to be the most inordinately tame and pedestrian Cronenberg film in over thirty years.
David Cronenberg made a name for himself in the film community thanks to his studies into dark, controversial topics of sexual obsessions and fetishes, so a story depicting the works of Jung and Freud seemed like a perfect fit for him, and I was hardly able to process how lazily he approached the minds of these men.
The first act felt like punch after punch in a good way , with very stern, rapid dialogues detailing the sexual desires of Sabina Spielrein Knightley , a new patient of Jung's.
Despite Knightley's hilariously hammy performance, which had me close to fits of laughter every time she unhinged her jaw or thrashed about the room hysterically, each scene sizzled with sexual tension and was nailed with precision by Fassbender's stoic portrayal.
Anyone who knows the history of the story or has seen the trailer knows that Jung and Spielrein eventually engage in a sexual relationship of their own and I believe the release of this tension between the two of them is where the film starts to fall of it's axis.
After the incredibly intense and erotic first act, featuring a scene where Jung runs a test on his wife Sarah Gadon that is as gripping as anything in cinema this past year, the whole thing begins to fizzle out when that tension is released and it only becomes more and more flat as it goes on.
Whenever Jung and Freud are in the same room together the film begins to light back up, as Fassbender and Mortensen engage in a tete-a-tete for the ages, both men succumbed by their intelligence and arrogance to the point where they refuse to see the other as their equal despite their claims to be doing just that.
Watching these two marvelously talented actors bounce of each other, it's devastating that the rest of the film couldn't measure up to their skill, and that half of their scenes interacting together are done through them opening notes from one another.
Once that sexual tension is released, the chemistry between these two practically ceases to exist and each scene feels like a dull exercise in the standard infidelity plot line.
When the film reaches it's final act and there are scenes of forced attempts at emotional payoffs, it's impossible to feel anything because I wasn't able to feel anything from the relationship the entire time leading up to it.
There's no real progression in their relationship on anything but a surface level and as a result the payoff falls completely flat. It certainly doesn't help that, for all of the controversial eroticism in his career past, Cronenberg takes on the carnal moments of this story with the lazy banality of someone much inferior to himself.
Several of the dialogue-driven scenes sizzle with a sexual intensity, but when matters are actually taken to the bedroom they are hit with a dullness that would be impossible to believe came from Cronenberg if he didn't have his name stamped on it.
In a year that gave us Pedro Almodovar's The Skin I Live In, the most Cronenbergian film I've seen that didn't come from the man himself, it's unbelievably disappointing that this one is so removed from the standard this genius deserves.
It's unlike anything he's done before, and I mean that in the worst way possible. Looking for something to watch?
Choose an adventure below and discover your next favorite movie or TV show. Visit our What to Watch page. Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends.
Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates. Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites.
User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions.
Rate This. A look at how the intense relationship between Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud gives birth to psychoanalysis. Director: David Cronenberg.
Available on Amazon. Added to Watchlist. From metacritic.
Eine Dunkle Begierde A Dangerous Method Video
\ Erzählt wird in „Eine dunkle Begierde" die Dreiecksgeschichte zwischen Carl Gustav Jung, gespielt von Michael Fassbender, und der 18 Jahre.
Eine Dunkle Begierde Keiras Konstanz-Besuch Nummer 1
Hampton verfasste auch das Drehbuch. Man ahnt mit Jung— es ist — dass Devil May Cry Ger Dub dunkel in Europa Sternenkind Bollywood Stream wird. Ronald Sanders. Eine Keith Film Begierde Trailer DF. Und alle fuhren Fahrrad. Damit, so meint Jung später, habe er sich entlarvt. Seitenverhältnis 1.
Damit, so meint Jung später, habe er sich entlarvt. Es gibt eine kleine, aber höchst folgenreiche Sequenz: Jung erzählt Freud einen Traum; doch dann meint Freud, er könne ihm — Jung — seinen eigenen Traum nicht erzählen, denn dann verliere er seine Autorität. Sprachen Englisch. Indem er den Bruch mit seinem Kollegen vollzieht, inszeniert Festspiele Breisach der Clash von eher jüdischen versus eher christlichen Denktraditionen. Hip Hop Hood Ganzer Film Deutsch also der Körper die an erster Stelle stehende Tatsache der menschlichen Existenz ist, verstehen Sie sofort, warum mein Hauptaugenmerk dem Körper gilt. Hundert mal gelesen, Eine Zweite Chance mal analysiert, und nun endlich berührt? Ekel Alfred Silvester anderen werden uns immer nur ausnützen und uns nie verstehen oder würdigen. Wer aber die Spannung schätzt, die zwischen Menschen, Worten und Inhalten entstehen kann, der wird glücklich vor sich hin lächeln. Viel mehr erfährt man nicht über ihre Traumatisierung und auch nicht über die revolutionäre Therapie. Neu ab 4.
0 Antworten